Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 262
Filter
1.
Hepatology ; 75(3): 634-645, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34724224

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) has collected data on liver transplant procedures performed in Europe since 1968. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Over a 50-year period (1968-2017), clinical and laboratory data were collected from 133 transplant centers and analyzed retrospectively (16,641 liver transplants in 14,515 children). Data were analyzed according to three successive periods (A, before 2000; B, 2000-2009; and C, since 2010), studying donor and graft characteristics and graft outcome. The use of living donors steadily increased from A to C (A, n = 296 [7%]; B, n = 1131 [23%]; and C, n = 1985 [39%]; p = 0.0001). Overall, the 5-year graft survival rate has improved from 65% in group A to 75% in group B (p < 0.0001) and to 79% in group C (B versus C, p < 0.0001). Graft half-life was 31 years, overall; it was 41 years for children who survived the first year after transplant. The late annual graft loss rate in teenagers is higher than that in children aged <12 years and similar to that of young adults. No evidence for accelerated graft loss after age 18 years was found. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric liver transplantation has reached a high efficacy as a cure or treatment for severe liver disease in infants and children. Grafts that survived the first year had a half-life similar to standard human half-life. Transplantation before or after puberty may be the pivot-point for lower long-term outcome in children. Further studies are necessary to revisit some old concepts regarding transplant benefit (survival time) for small children, the role of recipient pathophysiology versus graft aging, and risk at transition to adult age.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Survival/physiology , Liver Transplantation , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Transplantation Immunology/physiology , Adolescent , Age Factors , Child , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infant , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Liver Transplantation/methods , Liver Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Liver Transplantation/trends , Living Donors/statistics & numerical data , Male , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Time , Tissue and Organ Procurement/organization & administration , Tissue and Organ Procurement/statistics & numerical data
2.
Transpl Immunol ; 58: 101250, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31655110

ABSTRACT

Organ transplantation is an effective way to treat many end-stage diseases. In order to overcome post-transplant rejection, immunosuppressive agents have been widely used, but the long-term survival of transplanted organs still has not been achieved in the clinic. For decades, tolerance is the "holy grail" that transplant immunologists have longed for. The well-known approaches to induce immune tolerance are through adoptively transferred regulatory T cells and achieving chimeric states. In addition, there are a variety of promising potential strategies, including costimulatory blockade, regulating differentiation of immune cell subgroups, adoptive infusion of immunoregulatory cells, using apoptotic cells to induce tolerance, stem cell regenerative medicine to reconstitute tissue and organs, helminthic therapy, using exosomes carrying phagocytic antigen and phagocytic vesicles to induce tolerance, and blocking CD3 and targeted clearance of memory T cells. In this paper, we review the current developments and the potential of these strategies to achieve transplantation tolerance.


Subject(s)
Organ Transplantation , Regenerative Medicine/methods , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , Transplantation Immunology/physiology , Animals , Chimerism , Humans , Immune Tolerance , Immunomodulation , Transplantation, Homologous
3.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 144(6): 1498-1507, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31764674

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Scleroderma is a chronic connective tissue disease that results in fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. Although internal organ involvement corresponds with poor prognosis, systemic agents are effective at improving the effects of scleroderma on internal organs. In contrast, skin manifestations are universally present in all patients diagnosed with scleroderma, yet no systemic agents have been shown to be successful. Fat grafting has been shown to improve skin quality and improve contour irregularities and may be helpful in the treatment of patients with scleroderma. METHODS: The authors performed a thorough review of the pathophysiology of scleroderma and the current treatment options for scleroderma. The efficacy of fat grafting for the treatment of scleroderma and the mechanism by which fat grafting improves outcomes was also discussed. RESULTS: Scleroderma is characterized by chronic inflammation and vascular compromise that leads to fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. Fat grafting has recently been the focus of significant basic science research. It has been shown to reduce inflammation, reduce fibrosis by limiting extracellular matrix proteins and increasing collagenase activity, and provide structural support through stem cell proliferation and differentiation. The adipocytes, adipose stem cells, endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells in the processed fat likely contribute to the effectiveness of this treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Fat grafting in scleroderma patients likely improves skin manifestations by recreating fullness, correcting contour deformities, and improving skin quality. The injected fat provides a mixture of cells that influences the recipient site, resulting in improved outcomes.


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue/transplantation , Scleroderma, Localized/therapy , Scleroderma, Systemic/therapy , Adipose Tissue/immunology , Adult , Cell Differentiation/physiology , Cell Proliferation/physiology , Collagenases/metabolism , Extracellular Matrix Proteins/metabolism , Facial Dermatoses/therapy , Female , Fibrosis/prevention & control , Hand Dermatoses/therapy , Humans , Joint Diseases/immunology , Joint Diseases/therapy , Middle Aged , Neovascularization, Physiologic/physiology , Scleroderma, Localized/immunology , Scleroderma, Systemic/immunology , Stem Cells/physiology , Transplantation Immunology/physiology , Transplantation, Autologous
4.
Am Surg ; 85(6): 631-637, 2019 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31267905

ABSTRACT

The field of vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has moved from a highly experimental procedure to, at least for some patients, one of the best treatment alternatives for catastrophic tissue loss or dysfunction. Although the worldwide experience is still limited, progress has been made in translation to the clinic, and hand transplantation was recently designated standard of care and is now covered in full by the British Health System. This progress is tempered by the long-term challenges of systemic immunosuppression, and the rapidly evolving indications for VCA such as urogenital transplantation. This update will cover the state of and recent changes in the field, and an update of the Louisville VCA program as our initial recipient, the first person to receive a hand transplant in the United States celebrates the 20th anniversary of his transplant. The achievements and complications encountered over the last two decades will be reviewed. In addition, potential directions for research and collaboration as well as practical issues of how third party payers and funding are affecting growth of the field are presented.


Subject(s)
Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation/methods , Female , Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , Humans , Male , Postoperative Care/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Prognosis , Societies, Medical , Transplantation Immunology/physiology , Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation/adverse effects
5.
Prog Retin Eye Res ; 73: 100768, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31279005

ABSTRACT

In the past decade, novel lamellar keratoplasty techniques such as Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK) for anterior keratoplasty and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)/Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for posterior keratoplasty have been developed. DALK eliminates the possibility of endothelial allograft rejection, which is the main reason for graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Compared to PK, the risk of endothelial graft rejection is significantly reduced after DSAEK/DMEK. Thus, with modern lamellar techniques, the clinical problem of endothelial graft rejection seems to be nearly solved in the low-risk situation. However, even with lamellar grafts there are epithelial, subepithelial and stromal immune reactions in DALK and endothelial immune reactions in DSAEK/DMEK, and not all keratoplasties can be performed in a lamellar fashion. Therefore, endothelial graft rejection in PK is still highly relevant, especially in the "high-risk" setting, where the cornea's (lymph)angiogenic and immune privilege is lost due to severe inflammation and pathological neovascularization. For these eyes, currently available treatment options are still unsatisfactory. In this review, we will describe currently used keratoplasty techniques, namely PK, DALK, DSAEK, and DMEK. We will summarize their indications, provide surgical descriptions, and comment on their complications and outcomes. Furthermore, we will give an overview on corneal transplant immunology. A specific focus will be placed on endothelial graft rejection and we will report on its incidence, clinical presentation, and current/future treatment and prevention options. Finally, we will speculate how the field of keratoplasty and prevention of corneal allograft rejection will develop in the future.


Subject(s)
Corneal Transplantation , Graft Rejection/immunology , Keratoplasty, Penetrating , Transplantation Immunology/physiology , Corneal Diseases/surgery , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Humans , Lymphangiogenesis/physiology
6.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 143(4): 880e-886e, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30921156

ABSTRACT

Since the 1960s, skin has been considered to be the most allogenic tissue in humans. This tenet has remained unquestioned in the reconstructive transplant arena, which has led to skin serving as the sole monitor for early rejection in vascularized composite allotransplantation. In this article, the authors question the validity of this belief. The authors' hypothesis is that skin is not always an accurate monitor of rejection in the deep tissues, thus questioning the positive and negative predictive value of the punch biopsy for suspected vascularized composite allotransplantation rejection. A search was carried out identifying vascularized composite allotransplantation publications where the allogenicity of transplanted skin was evaluated. Eighteen publications claimed skin was found to be the most allogenic tissue in humans, justifying its use as a superior monitor for rejection. Eight publications demonstrated skin to be a poor monitor of rejection deeper to the skin. Two vascularized composite allotransplantation animal studies reported skin rejecting simultaneously with the deeper tissues. Finally, three publications discussed a skin and kidney allograft, transplanted simultaneously, indicating skin allogenicity was equivalent to the that of the kidney allograft. Much of the literature in human vascularized composite allotransplantation claims skin to be an excellent monitor of the deep tissues. The conclusion from this study is that skin does not always function as a good monitor for what could be rejecting in the deep tissues. The authors believe continued research is necessary to focus on expanding novel monitoring techniques and technologies to accurately diagnose vascularized composite allotransplantation rejection without tissue destruction.


Subject(s)
Composite Tissue Allografts/physiology , Skin Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Composite Tissue Allografts/immunology , Graft Rejection/physiopathology , Humans , Models, Animal , Terminology as Topic , Transplantation Immunology/physiology , Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation/trends
7.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 49(4): e13069, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30620396

ABSTRACT

Antibodies of non-human mammals are glycosylated with carbohydrate antigens, such as galactose-α-1-3-galactose (α-Gal) and N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc). These non-human carbohydrate antigens are highly immunogenic in humans due to loss-of-function mutations of the key genes involved in their synthesis. Such immunogenic carbohydrates are expressed on therapeutic polyclonal rabbit anti-human T-cell IgGs (anti-thymocyte globulin; ATG), the most popular induction treatment in allograft recipients. To decipher the quantitative and qualitative response against these antigens in immunosuppressed patients, particularly against Neu5Gc, which may induce endothelial inflammation in both the graft and the host. We report a prospective study of the antibody response against α-Gal and Neu5Gc-containing glycans following rabbit ATG induction compared to controls. We show a drop in the overall levels of anti-Neu5Gc antibodies at 6 and 12 months post-graft compared to the pre-existing levels due to the major early immunosuppression. However, in contrast, in a cross-sectional study there was a highly significant increase in anti-Neu5Gc IgGs levels at 6 months post-graft in the ATG-treated compared to non-treated patients(P = 0.007), with a clear hierarchy favouring anti-Neu5Gc over anti-Gal response. A sialoglycan microarray analysis revealed that the increased anti-Neu5Gc IgG response was still highly diverse against multiple different Neu5Gc-containing glycans. Furthermore, some of the ATG-treated patients developed a shift in their anti-Neu5Gc IgG repertoire compared with the baseline, recognizing different patterns of Neu5Gc-glycans. In contrast to Gal, Neu5Gc epitopes remain antigenic in severely immunosuppressed patients, who also develop an anti-Neu5Gc repertoire shift. The clinical implications of these observations are discussed.


Subject(s)
Antibodies/immunology , Immunity, Cellular/physiology , Immunoglobulin G/pharmacology , Immunologic Factors/pharmacology , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Neuraminic Acids/immunology , Adult , Aged , Antibodies/metabolism , Case-Control Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Thymocytes/immunology , Transplantation Immunology/physiology , Transplantation, Homologous
8.
Transplant Rev (Orlando) ; 33(2): 87-98, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30551846

ABSTRACT

Despite improvements in graft survival, solid organ transplantation is still associated with considerable infection induced morbidity and mortality. If we were able to show that serious infection risk was associated with excessive suppression of immune capacity, we would be justified in "personalizing" the extent of immunosuppression by carefully monitored reduction to see if we can improve immune compromize without increasing the risk of rejection. Reliable biomarkers are needed to identify this patients at an increased risk of infection. This review focuses on the currently available evidence in solid organ transplant recipients for immune non-pathogen specific biomarkers to predict severe infections with the susceptibility to particular pathogens according to the component of the immune system that is suppressed. This review is categorized into immune biomarkers representative of the humoral, cellular, phagocytic, natural killer cell and complement system. Biomarkers humoral and cellular systems of the that have demonstrated an association with infections include immunoglobulins, lymphocyte number, lymphocyte subsets, intracellular concentrations of adenosine triphosphate in stimulated CD4+ cells and soluble CD30. Biomarkers of the innate immune system that have demonstrated an association with infections include natural killer cell numbers, complement and mannose binding lectin. Emerging evidence shows that quantification of viral nucleic acid (such as Epstein Barr Virus) can act as a biomarker to predict all-cause infections. Studies that show the most promise are those in which several immune biomarkers are assessed in combination. Ongoing research is required to validate non-pathogen specific immune biomarkers in multi-centre studies using standardized study designs.


Subject(s)
Adenosine Triphosphate/immunology , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Graft Rejection/immunology , Infections/immunology , Killer Cells, Natural/immunology , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Biomarkers/analysis , Female , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Infections/etiology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Male , Organ Transplantation/methods , Organ Transplantation/mortality , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/microbiology , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Assessment , Survival Analysis , Transplantation Immunology/physiology , Treatment Outcome
9.
Transplant Rev (Orlando) ; 33(2): 77-86, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30579665

ABSTRACT

Invasive fungal infections constitute an important cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplantation recipients. Since solid organ transplantation is an effective therapy for many patients with end-stage organ failure, prevention and treatment of fungal infections are of vital importance. Diagnosis and management of these infections, however, remain difficult due to the variety of clinical symptoms in addition to the lack of accurate diagnostic methods. The use of fungal biomarkers can lead to an increased diagnostic accuracy, resulting in improved clinical outcomes. The evidence for optimal prophylactic approaches remains inconclusive, which results in considerable variation in the administration of prophylaxis. The implementation of a standard protocol for prophylaxis remains difficult as previous treatment regimens, which can alter the distribution of different pathogens, affect the outcome of antifungal susceptibility testing. Furthermore, the increasing use of antifungals also contributes to incremental costs and the risk of development of drug resistance. This review will highlight risk factors, clinical manifestations and timing of fungal infections and will focus predominately on the current evidence for diagnosis and management of fungal infections.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Immunocompromised Host , Invasive Fungal Infections/etiology , Invasive Fungal Infections/mortality , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Female , Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , Humans , Invasive Fungal Infections/diagnosis , Invasive Fungal Infections/drug therapy , Male , Mycoses/diagnosis , Mycoses/etiology , Mycoses/mortality , Organ Transplantation/methods , Prognosis , Risk Assessment , Survival Rate , Transplantation Immunology/physiology
10.
Transplant Rev (Orlando) ; 32(4): 187-193, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30139705

ABSTRACT

B cells play a crucial role in alloreactivity of organ transplant rejection and graft versus host diseases (GVHD). Over the past decade, it has been well recognized that B-cell infiltration in allografts and de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were strongly associated with severe graft rejection and loss, as well as glucocorticoid resistance. Emerging evidence has demonstrated that Follicular T helper (Tfh) cells are key effectors to promote the proliferation and differentiation of B cells into antibody-producing plasmablasts and memory B cells. T-follicular regulatory (Tfr) cells are a recently recognized cell population that has a negative regulatory role on Tfh cells in the follicle, preventing incessant antibody production. It is still less clear how those humoral immunoreactive cells affect transplant rejection and allograft loss. This review focuses on the production and function of Tfr/Tfh cells in the transplant environment. Better understanding of the functions and mechanisms of Tfr/Tfh cells will help to design new strategies to prevent allograft rejection and prolong graft survival.


Subject(s)
T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer/physiology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/physiology , Transplantation Immunology/physiology , Humans
11.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 71(5): 720-731, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29246419

ABSTRACT

Rapid changes in tissue-typing technology, including the widespread availability of highly specific molecular typing methods and solid-phase assays for the detection of allele-specific anti-HLA antibodies, make it increasingly challenging to remain up to date with developments in organ matching. Terms such as epitopes and eplets abound in the transplantation literature, but often it can be difficult to see what they might mean for the patient awaiting transplantation. In this review, we provide the historical context for current practice in tissue typing and explore the potential role of HLA epitopes in kidney transplantation. Despite impressive gains in preventing and managing T-cell-mediated rejection and the associated improvements in graft survival, the challenge of the humoral alloresponse remains largely unmet and is the major cause of late graft loss. Describing HLA antigens as a series of antibody targets, or epitopes, rather than based on broad seroreactivity patterns or precise amino acid sequences may provide a more practical and clinically relevant system to help avoid antibody-mediated rejection, reduce sensitization, and select the most appropriate organs in the setting of pre-existing alloantibodies. We explain the systems proposed to define HLA epitopes, summarize the evidence to date for their role in transplantation, and explore the potential benefits of incorporating HLA epitopes into clinical practice as this field continues to evolve toward everyday practice.


Subject(s)
Epitopes/immunology , Histocompatibility Testing/methods , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Transplantation Immunology/physiology , Female , Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , Humans , Isoantibodies/immunology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Nephrologists/education , Prognosis , Risk Assessment
12.
Transplant Rev (Orlando) ; 31(4): 257-267, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28882367

ABSTRACT

The diagnostic criteria for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) are constantly evolving in light of the evidence. Inclusion of C4d-negative ABMR has been one of the major advances in the Banff Classification in recent years. Currently Banff 2015 classification requires evidence of donor specific antibodies (DSA), interaction between DSA and the endothelium, and acute tissue injury (in the form of microvasculature injury (MVI); acute thrombotic microangiopathy; or acute tubular injury in the absence of other apparent cause). In this article we review not only the ABMR phenotypes acknowledged in the most recent Banff classification, but also the phenotypes related to novel pathogenic antibodies (non-HLA DSA, antibody isoforms and subclasses, complement-binding functionality) and molecular diagnostic tools (gene transcripts, metabolites, small proteins, cytokines, and donor-derived cell-free DNA). These novel tools are also being considered for the prognosis and monitoring of treatment response. We propose that improved classification of ABMR based on underlying pathogenic mechanisms and outcomes will be an important step in identifying patient-centered therapies to extend graft survival.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection/immunology , Isoantibodies/genetics , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Phenotype , Transplantation Immunology/physiology , Allografts/immunology , Biomarkers/analysis , Female , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Male , Prognosis , Risk Assessment
13.
Transpl Int ; 30(12): 1199-1208, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28892571

ABSTRACT

Regenerative medicine promises to meet two of the most urgent needs of modern organ transplantation, namely immunosuppression-free transplantation and an inexhaustible source of organs. Ideally, bioengineered organs would be manufactured from a patient's own biomaterials-both cells and the supporting scaffolding materials in which cells would be embedded and allowed to mature to eventually regenerate the organ in question. While some groups are focusing on the feasibility of this approach, few are focusing on the immunogenicity of the scaffolds that are being developed for organ bioengineering purposes. This review will succinctly discuss progress in the understanding of immunological characteristics and behavior of different scaffolds currently under development, with emphasis on the extracellular matrix scaffolds obtained decellularized animal or human organs which seem to provide the ideal template for bioengineering purposes.


Subject(s)
Biocompatible Materials , Regeneration/immunology , Regenerative Medicine/trends , Transplantation Immunology/physiology , Animals , Bioengineering , Forecasting , Graft Survival/immunology , Humans , Tissue Scaffolds , Transplantation, Autologous/methods , Transplantation, Homologous/methods
14.
Transpl Int ; 30(12): 1215-1225, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28493630

ABSTRACT

This was a nationwide cohort study to investigate the impact of anti-A/B and donor-specific anti-HLA (HLA-DSA) antibodies on the clinical outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). We classified a total of 1964 KTRs into four groups: transplants from ABO-incompatible donors (ABOi, n = 248); transplants in recipients with HLA-DSA (HLAi, n = 144); transplants from combined ABOi and HLAi donors (ABOi + HLAi, n = 31); and a control group for whom neither ABOi nor HLAi was applicable (CONT, n = 1541). We compared the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), allograft and patient survival rates. The incidence of BPAR was higher in the HLAi and ABOi + HLAi groups relative to the CONT group; in contrast, it was not higher in the ABOi group. Death-censored graft survival rates did not differ across the four groups. However, relative to the CONT group, patient survival rate was reduced in the ABOi and ABOi + HLAi groups, and with infection being the most common cause of death. Further, multivariable analysis revealed that desensitization therapy because of ABOi or HLAi was independent risk factors for patient mortality. HLAi was a more important risk factor for BPAR compared with ABOi. However, pretransplant desensitization therapy for either ABOi or HLAi significantly increased the risk of infection-related mortality.


Subject(s)
ABO Blood-Group System/immunology , Blood Group Incompatibility/complications , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , HLA Antigens/immunology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Cohort Studies , Female , Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Living Donors , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Republic of Korea , Risk Assessment , Survival Analysis , Transplantation Immunology/physiology , Treatment Outcome
15.
Transplant Rev (Orlando) ; 31(3): 180-187, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28456447

ABSTRACT

Compelling data suggest that lymphocyte depletion following T cell depleting therapy may induce prolonged CD4 T cell lymphopenia and trigger lymphocyte activation in some patients. These profound and non-reversible immune changes in T cell pool subsets are the consequence of both impaired thymic renewal and peripheral homeostatic proliferation. Chronic viral challenges by CMV play a major role in these immune alterations. Even when the consequences of CD4 T cell lymphopenia have been now well described, recent studies shed new light on the clinical consequences of immune activation. In this review, we will first focus on the mechanisms involved in T cell pool reconstitution after T cell depletion and further consider the clinical consequences of ATG-induced T cell activation and senescence in renal transplant recipients.


Subject(s)
Antilymphocyte Serum/physiology , Kidney Transplantation , Lymphocyte Activation/physiology , Lymphocyte Depletion , T-Lymphocytes/physiology , Transplantation Immunology/physiology , Humans
16.
Transplant Rev (Orlando) ; 31(1): 29-34, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28284304

ABSTRACT

With organs in short supply, only a limited number of kidney transplants can be performed a year. Live donor donation accounts for 1/3rd of all kidney transplants performed in the United States. Unfortunately, not every donor recipient pair is feasible because of Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization and ABO incompatibility. To overcome these barriers to transplant, strategies such as kidney paired donation (KPD) and desensitization have been developed. KPD is the exchange of donors between at least two incompatible donor-recipient pairs such that they are now compatible. Desensitization is the removal of circulating donor specific antibodies to prevent graft rejection. Regardless of the treatment strategy, highly sensitized patients whose calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) is ≥95% remain difficult to transplant with match rates as low as 15% in KPD pools. Desensitization has proved to be difficult in those with high antibody titers. A novel approach is the combination of both KPD and desensitization to facilitate compatible and successful transplantation. A highly sensitized patient can be paired with a better immunological match in the KPD pool and subsequently desensitized to a lesser degree. This article reviews the current progress in KPD and desensitization and their use as a combined therapy.


Subject(s)
Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Donor Selection/methods , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Living Donors , Transplantation Immunology/physiology , Female , Graft Rejection/immunology , Graft Survival/immunology , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Prognosis , Treatment Outcome
17.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 36(5): 491-498, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28162932

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transplantation of sensitized recipients has been associated with increased risk of post-transplant complications. In 2010, the Canadian Cardiac Transplant Network (CCTN) created a unique status listing for highly sensitized heart transplant candidates. Status 4S listing requires calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA) level >80% as the sole listing criteria and enables geographic expansion of the donor pool by providing national access. In this study, we describe patient characteristics and outcomes of those transplanted as Status 4S in Canada. METHODS: Patients' characteristics and clinical outcomes were retrospectively collected from all 11 adult heart transplant centers in Canada. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were listed Status 4S from January 2010 to September 2015. Fifty-two were transplanted as Status 4S. Of these 52 transplants, mean cPRA level was 93.4%, mean age was 47 years, 46% were male, 44% had dilated cardiomyopathy and 17% were re-transplanted for cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Blood group O comprised 42% and 53% had a left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant. Desensitization therapy occurred in 9 patients (17%). Over a mean follow-up period of 28 months (1 week to 5.3 years), 9 patients died (17%). Kaplan-Meier 1-year year survival is 86%. Two patients were treated for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in the first year post-transplant and 33% of patients had at least 1 ISHLT Grade ≥2R cellular rejection in the first year. Twenty-nine percent of patients developed de novo door-specific antibodies and demonstrated no correlation with AMR. Freedom from CAV at 1 year is 88.5% and at 5 years is 81.0%. Fifty-two percent of donor hearts originated from outside the recipients' geographic and organ donation organization. CONCLUSIONS: A national strategy of prioritizing highly sensitized heart transplant recipients has demonstrated effective expansion of the donor pool, acceptable short-term survival, freedom from CAV and low rates of clinically relevant AMR. However, we observed significantly higher rates of cellular rejection and de novo donor-specific antibody development in this population. It is currently unknown whether this will translate into poorer long-term outcome.


Subject(s)
Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , HLA Antigens/immunology , Heart Transplantation/methods , Tissue and Organ Procurement/legislation & jurisprudence , Transplant Recipients/legislation & jurisprudence , Adult , Canada , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Graft Survival , Heart Transplantation/mortality , Heart Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Histocompatibility Testing , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Policy Making , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Transplantation Immunology/physiology
18.
Rev Med Interne ; 38(9): 619-622, 2017 Sep.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28196699

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disorder of unknown cause. Apparition or flare of previously diagnosed sarcoidosis following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has rarely been reported. OBSERVATION: We report a 62-year-old woman who presented a radiological flare of sarcoidosis post-autologous stem cell transplantation for a POEMS syndrome. Imaging findings and lymph node histology, which revealed non-caseating granuloma, were consistent with the sarcoidosis diagnosis. The patient was asymptomatic and was kept free of treatment. CONCLUSION: Sarcoidosis must be considered ahead of compatible clinicoradiological presentation occurring after HSCT. Sarcoidosis can mimic metastatic cancer or lymphatic relapse. Tissue biopsies and exclusion of differential diagnosis of granuloma diseases are warranted to confirm sarcoidosis diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Sarcoidosis/etiology , Sarcoidosis/immunology , Transplantation Immunology/physiology , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , POEMS Syndrome/immunology , POEMS Syndrome/therapy , Sarcoidosis/diagnosis , Transplantation, Autologous
19.
Transplant Rev (Orlando) ; 31(1): 47-54, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28126347

ABSTRACT

Antibody-mediated rejection has now been recognized as one of the most important causes of graft loss. Transplantation across HLA barriers and nonadherence can result in acute antibody-mediated rejection, which is associated with particularly worse graft outcomes. New technologies, including genomic studies and assays to detect and define donor-specific antibodies, have provided important insights into the pathophysiology and diagnosis of acute antibody-mediated rejection but have engendered many questions about the clinical application of these tests in the prognosis and prevention of this protean disease process. In this article, we review the pathophysiology of acute antibody-mediated rejection, the evolving diagnostic criteria, and specific challenges related to its prognosis, treatment, and prevention.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection/immunology , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , HLA Antigens/immunology , Immunosuppression Therapy/methods , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Acute Disease , Female , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/diagnosis , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Male , Preoperative Care/methods , Primary Prevention/methods , Prognosis , Risk Assessment , Transplant Recipients , Transplantation Immunology/physiology
20.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 36(2): 227-236, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27574736

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Achieving long-term cardiac allograft survival without continuous immunosuppression is highly desired in organ transplantation. Studies have shown that Salvia miltiorrhiza, an herb also known as danshen, improves microcirculation and is highly effective in treating coronary heart disease. Our objective is to determine whether tanshinol, an ingredient of danshen, improves cardiac allograft survival. METHODS: Fully vascularized heterotopic heart transplantation was performed using BALB/c mice as donors and C57BL/6 mice as recipients, which were then treated with tanshinol and rapamycin. CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) were quantified by flow analyses, whereas CCL22 was measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting. RESULTS: We found that tanshinol significantly delayed cardiac allograft rejection. It promoted long-term allograft survival induced by rapamycin, a mammalian target-of-rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor. Tanshinol increased CD4+FoxP3+ Treg numbers in cardiac allografts, but not spleens and lymph nodes, of recipient mice by enhancing chemokine CCL22 expression in cardiac allografts, especially cardiac dendritic cells. In contrast, rapamycin increased Treg numbers in both lymphoid organs and allografts, suggesting that it generally expands Tregs. Moreover, Tregs induced by rapamycin plus tanshinol were more potent in suppressing T-cell proliferation in vitro than those from untreated recipients. Neutralizing CCL22 hindered CD4+FoxP3+ Treg migration to cardiac allografts and reversed long-term allograft survival induced by tanshinol plus rapamycin. CONCLUSIONS: Tanshinol suppresses cardiac allograft rejection by recruiting CD4+FoxP3+ Tregs to the graft, whereas rapamycin does so via expanding the Tregs. Thus, tanshinol cooperates with rapamycin to further extend cardiac allograft survival.


Subject(s)
Caffeic Acids/pharmacology , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Graft Survival/drug effects , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacology , Allografts , Animals , Biomarkers/blood , Biopsy, Needle , Blotting, Western , Chemokine CCL22/metabolism , Disease Models, Animal , Graft Rejection/immunology , Heart Transplantation/methods , Immunohistochemistry , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Random Allocation , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sirolimus/pharmacology , Tissue Donors , Transplant Recipients , Transplantation Immunology/physiology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...